Provisional deal on the corporate sustainability due diligence directive

EU has reached a provisional deal on the corporate sustainability due diligence directive (CSDDD), which aims to foster sustainable and responsible corporate behaviour throughout global value chains.

Large companies will be required to identify and, where necessary, prevent, end or mitigate adverse impacts of their activities on human rights, such as child labour and exploitation of workers, and on the environment, for example pollution and biodiversity loss.

This Directive will apply to the company’s own operations, its subsidiaries and their value chains.

What you need to do

In order to comply with the corporate risk-based due diligence duty, companies need to:

  • integrate due diligence into their policies
  • take appropriate measures to:
  • identify, assess and, where needed, prioritise actual or potential adverse human rights and environmental impacts
  • prevent or mitigate potential adverse impacts
  • bring to an end, minimise and remedy actual adverse impacts
  • establish and maintain a notification mechanism and complaints procedure
  • monitor the effectiveness of the due diligence policy and measures
  • publicly communicate on due diligence.

Companies that do not comply with these rules will face sanctions from national administrative authorities.

Victims will have the opportunity to seek legal redress for damages that they suffer as a result of the failure to conduct appropriate due diligence.

Furthermore, EU companies of substantial size and economic power – meeting threshold (1) below – will be required to adopt transition plans and make best efforts to ensure that their business strategy is compatible with limiting global warming to 1,5 °C.

The new diligence rules will apply to:

  • (1) EU limited liability companies of substantial size and economic power, i.e. with more than 500 employees and a net global turnover of more than €150 million
  • (2) EU limited liability companies that operate in specific high-impact sectors with more than 250 employees and a net global turnover of €40 million
  • (3) non-EU companies meeting the above thresholds with turnover generated in the EU.

The political agreement reached by the European Parliament and the Council is now subject to formal approval by the co-legislators.

Once published in the Official Journal, the Directive will enter into force 20 days after publication and Member States will have 2 years to transpose the provisions of the Directive into national law.

Source: Rules enforcing rights and environmental sustainability (europa.eu)

France has transposed the CSRD into its national law

France has transposed the CSRD into its national law, becoming the first EU member state to do so (the deadline for member states is July 2024).

CSRD puts sustainability reporting and governance processes at the top of the agenda. Do you have a system in place to meet these new requirements?

According to French law, the new article L. 821-2 in the trade code states that the auditor shall follow

  • the process of developing sustainability information (including in its future digital form)
  • the process implemented to determine the information to be published in accordance with the standards for reporting on sustainability (the double materiality assessment).

Where appropriate, the auditor shall make recommendations to ensure the integrity of these processes.

The French corporate governance report must now also contain a description of the main characteristics of the company’s internal control and risk management systems as part of the financial reporting process.

In addition, the disclosure requirement GOV–5 in ESRS 2 mandates the company to describe:

  • the scope, main features and components of the risk management and internal control processes and systems in relation to sustainability reporting
  • the risk assessment approach followed, including the risk prioritisation methodology
  • the main risks identified and their mitigation strategies including related controls
  • a description of how the company integrates the findings of its risk assessment and internal controls as regards the sustainability reporting process into relevant internal functions and processes – including
  • a description of the periodic reporting of these findings to the administrative, management and supervisory bodies.

If you have not yet set up a system to manage these new obligations, do not hesitate to contact us. The Cleerit ESG solution will get you compliant in just a few days for only €65 per month and user.


The CSRD has been transposed into French law (2023-1142 dated 6/12/2023). It replaces the previous non-financial reporting rules (“DPEF” in France), and the French “SAS” companies are now also included in the scope of the directive.

This obligation responds to the growing need for sustainability information expressed by financial institutions and many other stakeholders, including customers, social partners, public authorities and non-governmental organizations.

The required information will represent a strong incentive for companies to take virtuous actions in the areas concerned.

In the event of non-compliance

A person who has been unable to obtain the sustainability report from a company will have the right to ask the president of the court, ruling in summary proceedings under penalty, to order the company to communicate the report. Procedural costs, where applicable, will be charged to the company.

Economic actors who do not meet their obligation to publish a sustainability report will also be excluded from public procurement procedures and concession contracts.

Mandatory audit

The directive mandates that the sustainability report be audited, initially with limited assurance (i.e. covering the absence of material misstatement).

Previously, the auditor simply had to verify the presence of the “DPEF” in the management report, without controlling its content.

The certification report must be communicated to the shareholders within six months from the closing of the financial year.

A director of a legal person or entity required to have its sustainability report certified, is punishable by imprisonment of 2 years and a fine of 30,000 euros, if an independent third party organization registered on the list of professionals authorized to carry out the sustainability audit has not been appointed.

Obstructing the verification, or refusing to communicate on site all documents useful for carrying out the audit mission, is punishable by imprisonment of 5 years and a fine of 75,000 euros.


French text:

La CSRD est désormais transposée en droit français par l’ordonnance no 2023-1142 du 6/12/2023. Elle remplace les règles relatives à la DPEF, et les sociétés par actions simplifiées sont intégrées dans le champ de la directive.

Cette obligation répond au besoin croissant d’informations en matière de durabilité exprimé par les institutions financières et par de nombreuses autres parties prenantes, dont les clients, les partenaires sociaux, les pouvoirs publics et les organisations non-gouvernementales.

Les catégories d’informations demandées représentent ainsi une incitation forte pour les sociétés concernées à engager des actions vertueuses dans les domaines concernés.

En cas de non-conformité

Toute personne n’ayant pu obtenir la production, la communication ou la transmission des documents ou informations prévus, aura le droit de demander au président du tribunal statuant en référé soit d’enjoindre sous astreinte à la personne ou à l’organe compétent pour la production, la communication ou la transmission des documents ou informations de les communiquer, soit de désigner un mandataire chargé de procéder à cette communication.

Les frais de procédure sont, le cas échéant, mis à la charge de la personne ou de l’organe compétent.

Est également introduit dans la partie législative du code de la commande publique un nouveau dispositif d’exclusion des procédures de passation des marchés publics et des contrats de concession pour les opérateurs économiques qui ne satisfont pas à leur obligation de publication d’informations en matière de durabilité.

Audit obligatoire

La directive prévoit également que les informations en matière de durabilité publiées soient obligatoirement auditées, dans un premier temps, selon une norme d’assurance limitée – c’est-à-dire portant sur l’absence d’anomalie significative.

Auparavant, le commissaire aux comptes devait simplement vérifier la présence de la DPEF au sein du rapport de gestion, sans en contrôler le contenu.

Le rapport de certification doit être communiqué aux associés dans le délai de six mois à compter de la clôture de l’exercice comptable.

Est puni d’un emprisonnement de deux ans et d’une amende de 30 000 euros le fait, pour tout dirigeant d’une personne morale ou entité tenue de faire certifier ses informations en matière de durabilité, de ne pas provoquer la désignation d’un organisme tiers indépendant inscrit sur la liste des professionnels autorisés à procéder à l’audit de durabilité.

Est puni d’un emprisonnement de cinq ans et d’une amende de 75 000 euros le fait de mettre obstacle aux vérifications ou de refuser la communication sur place de toutes les pièces utiles à l’exercice de la mission d’audit.

Source : https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/download/pdf?id=fOTM7ilGbxcYwc159WYE-xxp0eSIBFgHonwOt6OlvQA=

Evaluatation of the quality of Taxonomy Art. 8 disclosures in 2022

The Taxonomy Regulation requires, in its Article 8, undertakings to include in their non-financial statements information on how, and to what extent, their activities are associated with economic activities that qualify as environmentally sustainable under Articles 3 and 9 of the Regulation.

This information is subject to mandatory auditing under CSRD.

The European Securities and Markets Authority, ESMA, has collected information for Fiscal Year 2022 published by European non-financial undertakings listed in regulated markets, to evaluate the quality of the disclosures with which issuers have responded to the new requirements.

  • Almost all issuers, among those being active in four main sectors covered by the Taxonomy Climate Delegated Act, disclosed the required Taxonomy alignment KPIs (96% of the sample).
  • Full reporting using the complete templates is mandatory, but for 30% of the sample they were either modified or not fully completed, which may impact comparability and make access to the data more difficult for users.
  • For more than 40% of the assessed issuers, at least some of the mandatory qualitative information regarding the assessment of the nature of their activities, the technical screening criteria, the Do No Significant Harm – DNSH criteria, and the minimum safeguards, was missing or insufficient.
  • Only 40% of the sample provided comments on their eligibility or alignment rates.
  • In addition to the points mentioned above, areas of incorrect application were spotted in relation to the transparency on the avoidance of double counting, the screening of activities against one climate objective only or the reconciliation with financial reporting.

Based on these findings, ESMA reminds issuers of the importance of providing all quantitative as well as detailed qualitative information as required by the Disclosures Delegated Act.

ESMA strongly encourages issuers to use the guidance and tools that the European Commission has published, including guidance on the interpretation and application of certain criteria and disclosures, and online tools to assist undertakings in their Taxonomy reporting.

Access the EU Taxonomy Navigator here >>

ESMA also notes that the European Commission’s June 2023 Communication stresses the role of the Taxonomy as a “common language” which plays a key role in the EU’s Sustainable Finance framework, and which can be further used by undertakings to plan investments and set targets for their transition.

Source: ESMA

CSRD & ESRS updates and adjustments

In a vote in the European Parliament on 18 October, MEPs reaffirmed the commitment to the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), mandatory under the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), which will apply from January 2024 onwards as initially planned.

With over 90% of the commitments made in the 2019 Political Guidelines delivered, the EU Commission also reaffirmed the commitment to reduce reporting requirements by 25%, in line with the strategy to boost the EU’s long-term competitiveness and to provide relief for SMEs, without undermining the policy objectives of the concerned initiatives.

Examples of the expected simplifications include:

➡ A 2-year delay of the date of adoption of the sector-specific ESRS, currently required in 2024, to allow companies to focus on the implementation of the first set of sector-agnostic ESRS adopted on 31 July 2023.

➡ A 2-year delay of the date of adoption of the ESRS to be used by certain non-EU companies with business in the Union.

Considering that the reporting requirements for these non-EU companies only apply from financial year 2028, this will allow more resources to be dedicated to the development of effective and proportionate sector-specific ESRS, while still giving enough time for these non-EU companies to prepare ahead of financial year 2028.

➡ An increase in the size criteria in the Accounting Directive by 25% to account for the effects of inflation. This would reduce the scope of application of the presentation, audit and publication requirements for financial statements, and also the scope of application of the CSRD and the EU Taxonomy Regulation (Art. 8).

The classification of companies into “micro”, small”, “medium” or “large”, is based on meeting two out of three size criteria: two monetary size criteria, the “balance sheet total” and “net turnover”, and the average number of employees.

Over a period of 10 years from 1 January 2013 to 31 March 2023, the cumulated inflation reached 24.3% in the euro area and 27.2% for the EU27.

Initially, all large EU companies meeting two of the following three criteria: more than 250 employees, a net turnover exceeding €40m and/or a balance sheet total exceeding €20m, were required to report according to ESRS for financial year 2025 at the latest (report due in 2026).

With this adjustment, the monetary size criteria will to increase to a net turnover exceeding €50m and/or a balance sheet total exceeding €25m.

Source: IMMC.COM%282023%29596%20final.ENG.xhtml.1_EN_ACT_part1_v5.docx (europa.eu)

Transparency, and the public benchmarks that follow, are important drivers of change

This report details the performance of 350 companies assessed in the Food and Agriculture Benchmark. The underlying datasets are available to download online: 2023 Food & Agriculture Benchmark ranking

We can be expecting many more of these benchmarks, across all sectors, when the ESRS reports – mandatory for companies subject to CSRD – are released.

Governance, Strategy and Impact, Risk & Opportunity management are key reporting areas in both the ESRS and ISSB-IFRS-S standards.

Governance & Strategy was also one of the 4 measurement areas in this benchmark.

It focused on the integration of sustainable development objectives and targets into companies’ core strategy, business model and governance structure.

The report explains that “it captures companies’ overall commitment to sustainable development, including whether the company’s highest governing board is responsible for leading its progress on sustainability targets, as well as its stakeholder engagement and lobbying activities”.

The number 1 (Unilever) in this benchmark scored 63.2 out of 100 on Governance & Strategy, number 35 (Carrefour) scored 42.5, number 183 (ICA Gruppen) scored only 18.8.

These are surprisingly low numbers, even for the top-performers. Just think about it: the score “captures companies’ overall commitment to sustainable development”.

If you are aiming for the world to trust that you are truly committed to sustainability, you need to focus on strategy and governance – it will set the pace for all the rest.

The standard-setters know this, which is why you will have to disclose in detail on these processes. They will also be key areas of scrutiny for your auditor following the instructions in IAASB 5000.

And there is no excuse for bad performance here.

Off-the-shelf – CSRD-compliant and ESRS-ready – sustainability strategy, governance & reporting software is available to help you.

It’s neither expensive, nor complicated and the ROI is very high – your chances of strategic success triple. You just need to really want to get better.

You are welcome to contact us if you want to know how.

Set the stage for real transformation

CSRD is about future-proofing your business.

ESRS is where sustainability meets strategy and sets the stage for real transformation and profitable business.

The European Sustainability Reporting Standards, ESRS, mandatory for companies subject to CSRD, specify the information that the company shall disclose to allow for readers to understand its material impacts on people and environment, and the material effects of sustainability matters on the company’s development, performance and position.

Future-proofing is the process of anticipating the future and developing methods of minimizing the effects of shocks and stresses of future events – on the company’s development, performance and position.

The ESRS strategy disclosure requirements, SBM, focus on how the company’s strategy and business model interact with, and addresses, its material sustainability impacts, risks and opportunities.

  • The term “impacts” refers to positive and negative, actual or potential, sustainability-related impacts that are connected with the company’s business, as identified through an impact materiality assessment.
  • The term “risks and opportunities” refers to the company’s sustainability-related financial risks and opportunities, including those deriving from dependencies on natural, human and social resources, as identified through a financial materiality assessment.

But, it’s not only about mitigating adverse impact and risks, it’s also about pursuing new opportunities, as laid out in EU’s new growth strategy the Green Deal.

What does ESRS say about opportunities?

To start with, when reporting on material opportunities, the reader should be able to understand if the opportunity is currently being pursued and is already incorporated in the company’s own general strategy, or if it is just general opportunity for the company or the sector it operates in. (ESRS-1.109)

ESRS also lists 5 opportunity levers the company can consider: Resource efficiency, Markets, Financing, Reputation and Resilience.

Resource efficiency, e.g.,
  • Transition to more efficient services and less resource-intense processes.
  • Decrease quantities of substances used or improve efficiency of production process to minimise impacts.
  • Eco-design for longevity, repair, reuse, recycle, by- products, take-back systems, decoupling activity from extraction of materials, intensifying circular material use, creation of a system that allows for dematerialization (e.g., digitisation, improving utilisation rates, weight reduction).
  • Practices to ensure products and materials are collected, sorted, and reused, repaired, refurbished, remanufactured.
Markets, e.g.,
  • Development of less resource-intense products and services.
  • Diversification of business activities.
  • Demand for less resource-intense products and services, and new consumption models such as product-as- a-service, pay-per-use, sharing, leasing.
Financing, e.g.,
  • Access to green funds, bonds or loans
Reputation, e.g.,
  • Positive stakeholder relations and engagement as a result of a proactive stance on managing risks.
  • Preferred partner status.
Resilience, e.g.,
  • Diversification of resources and business activities (e.g., start a new business unit to recycle new materials)
  • Investing in green infrastructures
  • Adopting recycling and circularity mechanisms that reduce dependencies.
  • Increase the capability to safeguard future stocks and flows of resources.

ESRS is as much about strategy as it is about reporting, so you will need CSRD-ready sustainability strategy & reporting digital support to succeed.

What better way to start than to see ESRS on your screen, fully digitized? Ready to navigate, learn, share and get ready.

The science-based SaaS solution Cleerit ESG helps you

  • factor in risk exposure,
  • identify, assess and manage material topics,
  • unlock the potential of your materiality assessments,
  • cascade ambitious targets and
  • create actionable roadmaps for strategic success –
  • while preparing CSRD and
  • automating your sustainability reporting with ESRS-ready templates.

And secure, modern SaaS technology makes it all easy and affordable.

You have rarely had such a high Return On Investment. Why wait?

CSRD vs ESRS, what’s the difference?

On 5 January 2023, the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) entered into force.

➡ The CSRD is an EU “directive” (2022/2464) – a legislative act that sets out a goal that EU countries must achieve.

The CSRD supports the Union’s legal framework and the objectives of the EU Green Deal.

The EU Green Deal is the new growth strategy of the European Union, which aims to transform the Union into a modern, resource-efficient and competitive economy with no net emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG) by 2050, while leaving no person and no place behind.

It will contribute to the EU objective of building an economy that works for the people, strengthening the Union’s social market economy, helping to ensure that it is ready for the future and that it delivers stability, jobs, growth and sustainable investment.

To succeed the Green Deal, it is necessary for the EU to reorient capital flows towards sustainable investment in order to achieve sustainable and inclusive growth, manage financial risks stemming from climate change, resource depletion, environmental degradation and social issues, and foster transparency and long-termism in financial and economic activity.

Disclosing relevant, comparable and reliable sustainability information amongst companies is a prerequisite for meeting those objectives.

The EU Commission was therefore empowered to adopt mandatory common sustainability reporting standards, to ensure that information was comparable, and that all relevant information was disclosed consistent with EU needs.

Building on the double materiality principle, the standards needed cover all information that is material to users of that information.

The development of mandatory common sustainability reporting standards was also necessary to

✔ Enable the assurance and digitalisation of sustainability reporting

✔ Facilitate its supervision and enforcement

✔ Reach a situation in which sustainability information has a status comparable to that of financial information

➡ The adoption of such mandatory common sustainability reporting standards was completed by means of a delegated act on the first set of European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) on 31 July 2023.

ESRS is now to be used for sustainability reporting by all undertakings subject to the CSRD.

These mandatory sustainability reporting standards (ESRS) specify the information that undertakings are to report in accordance with CSRD articles 19a and 29a-b.

🍃 ESRS is where sustainability meets company strategy and sets the stage for real transformation.

You will need CSRD-compliant and ESRS-ready sustainability strategy & reporting software to succeed.

➡ Contact us if you are interested in a two-month trial of the SaaS solution Cleerit ESG for 65 € per month and user.

Are you ready to disclose details about how your strategy and business model relate to – or affect – sustainability matters?

ESRS 2, SBM-1 datapoint 40, compulsory for all companies subject to CSRD, require companies to disclose detailed information about the key elements of its general strategy that relate to or affect sustainability matters:

➡ description of significant groups of products and/or services offered

➡ description of significant markets and/or customer groups served

➡ where applicable and material, products and services that are banned in certain markets

➡ breakdown of total revenue by significant ESRS sectors

➡ where applicable, a statement indicating, together with the related revenues, that the company is active in the following sectors

✔ fossil fuel (coal, oil and gas)
✔ chemicals production
✔ controversial weapons
✔ cultivation and production of tobacco

➡ its sustainability-related goals, including an assessment, in terms of significant groups of products and services, customer categories, geographical areas and relationships with stakeholders

➡ the elements of the company’s strategy that relate to or impact sustainability matters, including the main challenges ahead, critical solutions or projects to be put in place, when relevant for sustainability reporting.

The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of the company’s exposure to impacts, risks and opportunities and where they originate.

Disclosure requirement E1-1 also requires the company to disclose its transition plan for climate change mitigation, to ensure that its strategy and business model are compatible with the transition to a sustainable economy and the objective of achieving climate neutrality by 2050, in alignment with EU Climate Law and Benchmark Regulation.

The European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) have now been adopted for use by all companies subject to the CSRD. If you are aiming for a good ESG rating, it’s time to get started.

ESRS is major opportunity to build awareness, resilience, efficiency and sustainable growth opportunities. It’s where sustainability meets strategy.

What better way to start than to see it on your screen, fully digitized? Ready to navigate, learn, share and get CSRD-ready.

The science-based SaaS solution Cleerit ESG helps you factor in risk exposure, identify and manage material topics, unlock the potential of your materiality assessments and create actionable roadmaps for strategic success

– while preparing CSRD and automating your sustainability reporting with ESRS-ready templates.

Contact us if you are interested in a two-month trial of the SaaS solution Cleerit ESG for only 65 € per month and user.

A narrow focus on data collection is no longer fit for purpose

Under CSRD & ESRS, conducting stakeholder surveys to define what sustainability matters are material to your organization is no longer fit for purpose. Nor is a narrow focus on data collection.

Stakeholder concerns and evidence of actual and potential impacts are now in focus, not ranking the relative importance of different sustainability matters.

ESRS is process oriented. Numerical data only account for 30% of the disclosure requirements.

70% of ESRS is about contextual narrative disclosure, and more than 40% of the disclosures require accounting for policies, targets and actions for material topics, according to detailed Minimum Disclosure Requirements (MDR).

The material topics are to be found in the list of 92 topics provided in ESRS 1 (AR 16) that the company shall consider, together with entity-specific material topics.

When asked, “from a data collection point of view, how should business adapt to meet the requirements of mandatory regulations?”, Chiara Del Prete (Sustainability Reporting TEG Chair EFRAG), answered:

“I wonder whether collection of data is entirely capturing the transformational element of what we are trying to achieve in terms of direction of travel.”

“To the extent that they have policies, targets and actions in place to identify, mitigate, prevent and account for their impacts on people and environment – those data will be the same as those we would like to see coming into reports.”

“This is to say that there is much more than collection of data.”

CSRD & ESRS support the European Green Deal – a new growth strategy that aims to transform the Union into a fair and prosperous society, with a modern, resource-efficient and competitive economy where there are no net emissions of greenhouse gases in 2050 and where economic growth is decoupled from resource use.

In 2022, McKinsey estimated that to reach net zero emissions, an additional $3.5 trillion a year must be invested in physical assets for energy and land-use systems until 2050.

That is the greatest reallocation of capital in history.

So, surveys and data collection will not be enough. Building awareness, skills and transparency – and closing the gap between sustainability, strategy and execution – will be key to success.

Exit stakeholder questionnaires. Enter robust due diligence processes.

Exit narrow focus on data collection. Enter efficient risk management and strategic plans supported by evidence, actions & resources and KPIs.

And, exit manual spreadsheets and glossy ESG-brochures.

Enter holistic, inclusive, fit-for-purpose system support supporting both sustainability strategy and reporting.

Reporting is necessary, but if we are looking to transform, reporting is only a means to an end, not the end.